53 years ago today the first episode of Doctor Who was broadcast and I’m re-watching the first story once a week to see if I can recapture the magic.
It is impossible to imagine just what an impact this episode had on anyone watching it in 1963 but equally impossible to imagine that anybody would not want to watch the next episode. This really is a textbook example of how to set up a new series in any genre. Keep it simple, tease mysteries, focus on a handful of characters and make it visually stunning. `An Unearthly Child` does all this and never puts a foot wrong. Years back I remember older fans who’d seen the original broadcast talking in hushed tones about its magnificence and even though I’ve seen it lots of times I’m now not sure I have ever actually watched it. That is to say allowed its contents to reveal themselves without the accumulated narrative weight of 53 more years of Doctor Who swimming about my head. When you do that there is something compelling about every minute of this.
It is impossible to imagine just what an impact this episode had on anyone watching it in 1963 but equally impossible to imagine that anybody would not want to watch the next episode. This really is a textbook example of how to set up a new series in any genre. Keep it simple, tease mysteries, focus on a handful of characters and make it visually stunning. `An Unearthly Child` does all this and never puts a foot wrong. Years back I remember older fans who’d seen the original broadcast talking in hushed tones about its magnificence and even though I’ve seen it lots of times I’m now not sure I have ever actually watched it. That is to say allowed its contents to reveal themselves without the accumulated narrative weight of 53 more years of Doctor Who swimming about my head. When you do that there is something compelling about every minute of this.
Take the way it starts. We’ve grown so accustomed to the original
title sequence that the shock of how it must have seemed to the 1963 viewer is
lost. It looks like nothing you’ve ever seen before and in monochrome it flows
bizarrely while the haunting theme music carries on for 1 minute and 38 seconds
panning around the junkyard until the camera comes to rest on a police box.
Only then do the title and writer credits appear. Of course we’ve all seen the
pilot which is messier than this but now I realise that’s probably only because
of the ambition of Waris Hussein’s directorial ideas.
Even though it’s totally studio bound he directs with filmic
intent, making the most of the shadowy junkyard set- focussing on a cracked
mask for no reason than to spook us out!- while he pulls his camera in close to
faces. There is nothing dull about this, he draws every line to your attention
so as you feel you are right there. Most interesting are the flashbacks as Ian
and Barbara discuss their problematic pupil and we see her talking to teachers but
actually she’s sometimes looking directly at us. Throughout Hussein keeps us moving in what
could easily have been a much more static production. When Barbara and Ian and
then the audience stumble into the TARDIS the contrast of the brightly lit interior
compared to the dark scene outside is powerful. As for the first TARDIS flight,
the thunderous sound and strange patterns threaten to leap out of the screen as
they must have done to even greater impact back then. It is stunning.
Anthony Coburn’s script is so economical, there is not a word wasted yet by the
end we know the four characters quite well. Ian and Barbara’s differing
reactions to the turn of events is particularly rewarding as they push each other
into following Susan. When they enter the TARDIS, Ian is desperate to know what
they are seeing; “I want to understand” he pleads. Barbara on the other hand
maintains it’s still an illusion. As for Susan, was she ever as odd as she is
here? Her alien hand dance and distant stare convey an alien quality yet her
time on Earth seems to have softened her responses to the intrusion. The Doctor
on the other hand is having none of it. In the pilot he is snappier, less warm
and a little off putting but the subtle way William Hartnell adjusts his
performance second time round is quite astounding. He retains a menace- just
look at his face when we see his reaction to the teacher’s conversation going
on behind him- yet it’s softened with a playful, child- like ambivalence to their questions.
Coburn balances this four way dialogue so strongly to the point where we’re
never quite sure who to side with. Sure, it’s wrong to keep the teachers locked
inside this odd place but don’t we just want to know what it can do?
Though much has been written – and excused- by way of this
being archive television, `An Unearthly Child` is not without elements that
seem to foresee the series’ future. The incidental music as the teachers
investigate the junkyard sounds sonically similar to Geoffrey Burgon’s
Seventies work on the series. Warris Hussein’s direction seems to come from a
much later time while the show would rarely acknowledge pop culture for a long
time yet manages to give Ian a knowledge of the latest chart sensations.
So this is where Doctor
Who starts with a triumphant opening, the first ever dialogue (“Wait in
there Susan, I won’t be long”) and a marvellously theatrical handkerchief waving
entrance from William Hartnell. Like the viewers of 1963 I know very little
about what is to come having only ever watched the subsequent three episodes at
a convention not paying as much attention as I should have. Only a week to go….
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.