Why
does a two part story broadcast 33 years ago leave such a strong impression?
Maybe it’s because while it contains many elements you might expect to
encounter in an Eighties Doctor Who story, `The Awakening` cuts out a lot of
the filler that often extended stories unnecessarily cutting to the essence of
the series. In a lot of ways it’s similar to the series we have now- 50 minutes
of mystery, excitement. It is indeed something very wonderful and strange!
Little was known by fans about Eric Pringle before he wrote it and the story
proved to be his sole contribution to Doctor Who. This always seemed a shame as
he appeared to have found a way to create a well thought out story packed with
interesting characters, an alien with real visual impact and romps along at
quite a rate. I used to think it should have been 3 parts but now I realise it
is perfect as it is.
It
has “pure evil” long before that phrase wore out its welcome later in the
decade which is how the Doctor describes The Malus. The creature’s gradual
unveiling from behind a crumbling wall and realisation as a giant devilish face
belching smoke and noise is nothing short of stunning. Eric Pringle’s economic
yet precise script explains it well- a machine of war created by harnassing psychic
energy. The story does have echoes of both `The Daemons` and `Image of the
Fendahl` but is sufficiently different to stand as their equal. It remains one
of the most effective latter day monsters squatting in designer Barry Newberry’s
superb church set which looks so good you think it really is a church.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ec52/8ec528d8cfe3ce989edd357519975848415b1540" alt=""
The
production is blessed with a splendid cast led by Polly James who plays Jane
Hampden as a determined yet confused foil for the Doctor. Likewise Keith Jayne
whose as befuddled 16th century urchin Will Chandler acts his socks
off. Its been said before but these two would have been excellent companions
whom audiences would have taken too but the series was never as daring as that
back in the day. It is noticeable though how both work better with Peter
Davison’s Doctor than the current incumbents moany Tegan and shifty Turlough.
Both Janet Feilding and Mark Strickson do their best but neither character is
likeable something that applies in all the stories they inhabit. Dennis Lill
always gives good value stopping just short of overdoing maters while Glyn
Houston’s charm overcomes the one plot hole of why Woolsey is not as affected
by the Malus’ influence thought this may because he’s a decent man?
Director
Michael Owen Morris’ marshalling of such enviable resources adds a further
level of class to `The Awakening`. Each time The Malus snorts and growls the
cameras get closer to its eyes. Other impressive visuals include the silver
coated `ghosts` and the mini Malus hanging about in the Tardis.
Various
accounts have suggested the story was heavily re-written by Eric Saward and
that Eric Pringle wasn’t too pleased. Yet when you compare it to other stories
of the time it does have something extra special about it and that can only
have come from the credited writer. I’ve just read a post on Facebook too from
someone saying what a nice man Eric Pringle was. In a varied career, he also
penned episodes of well liked series like The
Pretenders and some children’s books. By a weird coincidence perhaps
orchestrated by a more playful Malus, I’m currently working on a children’s
book in which one of the villages is called Hodcombe as a tribute to what is
one of the best Doctor Who stories of the 1980s.
Eric Pringle 1935- 2017
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.